Thursday, 29 March 2012

Anthropology in the future

Urban Barn's Colourful Coffee-table Buddha. http://media.metronews.topscms.com/images/ef/0b/6e0eda7b453495458e0c863bf84a.jpeg

One thing that has been occupying my mind lately is what are archaeologists going to look at in the future?

So much of our culture today is contained within the Internet, on CDs, USB sticks, and other pieces of technology. So much of the things that take president in our lives rely on electricity to be functional and useful, so what will happen when the time comes that our sources of technology are forgotten or unusable. For example, VHS cassettes are increasingly hard to play, even now, because they have been replaced by DVDs and BluRay disks. But, if you are not able to play these disks or tapes what would they be interpreted as? Hypothetically, when our technologies are all out of date a thousand years in the future what will be deemed important?
http://www.worldtvpc.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/internet-tv-killing-dvd.jpg

I also question, will they care? Has our civilization documented every aspect of our culture so thoroughly that, in the future, there will be no curiosity about the 21st century? There are some people who have kept a record of their thoughts on the Internet in the form of bloggs or web-pages for years, will these be taken into account to judge our society? Will our technology ensure that we are remembered in years to come, or will it make it easier for us to be forgotten?

When thinking of the affect we have on the archaeological record it is also interesting to think about what items they might focus on in future studies of the 21st c. There will be so much left behind in land fills and settlements that I wonder if they will even care. Some of the adds on the internet I don't even know what the items are for so how would it be interpreted later on. And so much of what we own today is so trivial, in western societies we often itemize everything, I remember seeing decorative neon statues of Buddha at Urban Barn and thinking "that is compleetly out of context!"

Oreo Scoops? Honestly... Imagen finding these without knowing what an Oreo is. Completely confusing!http://d1535dk28ea235.cloudfront.net/preset_65/oreo_scooper.png



I realize this post is not the most cognitive but its just a little bit of what I have been thinking lately... why will future generations want to learn about our culture and will the multitude of crap we leave behind daunt them in any way?

Monday, 19 March 2012

Paleolithic Spit Painting in at Home!

For another one of my classes, ANTH 392: Paleolithic Art, I am currently working on a term project on spit painting. This is the method used at Pech Merel in the Quercy region of France to create the famous spotted horses dating 250,000 BCE.

For this project a friend and I are attempting to learn how to spit paint. It is surprisingly hard. To create this effect you have to chew up, or grind, charcoal which then you put in your mouth and spit on the wall. You have to be careful otherwise you will end up with huge globs instead of the fine spray that is desired...
Lorblanchet's beautiful horse....
My Pathetic first attempt... waaaay too much saliva!
Although the top bit is okay...
For this project I am using "Art- Arch Charcoal" which is made of burned rods that vary from stick to stick, some of them are a lot harder to chew but it is the safest choice health wise. 
So basically you chew up the stick and then, while trying to keep your mouth as dry as possible you spit it onto the wall. We tried this in class during a lab as well, on paper, and it turned out really soggy!

Using my hand as a stencil I was able to make the first hand with one stick of charcoal. As you can see from the picture, there were a lot of globs the first go. The second one I chewed the charcoal more at the front of my mouth using my incisors in stead of my molars, that worked a lot better. Also, I tried using my tongue as a stopper more in the second one. 
Much better!
Each Hand took about 7 minutes... but I think that as you get better it takes more time. To see how the pro's do it watch the video at the end of the page!

The advantages to spit painting is that no matter how rough the surface you are working with, such as cave walls, the paint will still reach all the crevices. Using a brush is harder because you have to dab in order to get the sharp dark lines achieved in the Pech Merle picture. 

This method  is not just limited to France though, or even to the Paleolithic. There is still a group of people who practice this art form today! The Aborigines of Australia use it to create hand marks as well. 
Lovely!

I will ad to this blog after I have experimented some more. Tomorrow I plan to try some lines using my hands to channel the paint!
Me and my hand, yummy yummy.




 Watch this video from 3:00 - 7:00. Its a snip of "The Incredible Human Journey- Europe".  There is some interesting information about the development of white skin as well as looking at first settlements... it moves really fast. 

Monday, 12 March 2012

My Mycenae MUST be Better than....Mycenae

When searching the Internet for information on Mycenae I came across this website on Mycenae.
http://www.grisel.net/images/greece/Mycenae24.JPG
I assume this is Jeff Prosise... At the Lion Gate!
This website reads much like a tourist pamphlet; it has an introductory/ background paragraph at the top of the page with a few links to other "informative sites" about Mycenae and its glorious history. This website presents Heinrich Schliemann's view of Mycenae being the home of Agamemnon as described in Homer's epics without providing any proof (like Schliemann) for this claim. It does have a number of lovely pictures, all taken by the sites creator Grisel Gonzalez and friend Jeff Prosise, which are accompanied by descriptions that I quite liked. It appears to me that this is a site made after a trip and, probably, a guided tour of the Mycenae site on Holiday. What brings me to this conclusion is that: a) it presents a romanticized and good-story account of Mycenae's history, b) it shows no references for where the information is gathered from, and c) Gonzalez and Prosise are in some of the photos...and d) it is linked to another site titled "Our World Travels" by the same people. 


As a brows through site I almost liked it, loved the pictures, but as an informative anything it falls flat.


The point of this entry was to find a site on the same topic as the topic that Abbey, Lisa, and Kate and I have chosen for our website project, Mycenae, and then hold it up against our own grading rubric. It almost feels unfair to judge this travel site against our more academic grading scheme but, when it all boils down, they are propelling false information even if they do not mean to. Also, there are very few sites geared to the public on Mycenae and I had to choose one to tear a strip from.
So here I go!


Research Question: 1/8, This site does not seem to aim to answer any specific questions apart from "What is Mycenae?" and even that question they answer incorrectly; there is no concrete proof that Agamemnon ever came in contact with this city, let alone was buried there.
Analysis: 1/8, The site, as I said earlier, seems to be regurgitated information from a guided tour. They also do not try and support any of the information they present or question if there was another possible explanation for this site other than "it must be the city Homer spoke of!".
Evidence: 0/8, No evidence is provided. 
Content: 2/8, The site provides a narrow and minimal explanation of the site and, given that there was never any proof of Agamemnon living there (other than Schliemann's ridiculous naming of artefacts) the information is inappropriate to be presented as fact or without a disclaimer.  
Total for Information: 4/36
Visual Impact: 5/8, The site does present an interesting to look at page, It is a good mixture of image and text and I really liked the colour coordination and the artistic touch of the Greek columns topped with statues that provide the border. 
Format/ Navigation: 4/8, the page is easy to navigate and seems complete but not all the links are working. It is quite simple and when you do navigate to viewing the pictures it is tedious and a bit boring.
Total for Aesthetics Section: 9/16
Spelling & Grammar: 4/4, There are no spelling mistakes. Way to go!
Clarity: 3/4, This site has no jargon and is extremely easy to read by any person, no matter their education. Could be considered overly simplistic. 
Sources: 1/4, No sources are used. 
Photographs: 4/4, There are a number of lovely photos on this site and I might even use them for  my own! 
Total for Basics: 12/16


Total Score of the site: 25/68
37%, in other words a Fail according to the Team Wilberforce Rubric.


I'm sorry to have had to fail this teeny-tiny site. At least I know that our site shall be better than this one was. 


Thanks for reading,


Emily 







Saturday, 18 February 2012

St. John the Baptist: Heritage Church, Colwood B.C.

My group (Abbey, Lisa, and Kate) and I are looking at St. John the Baptist’s Church in Colwood as the focus of our Monument assignment. I suggested it one day in class, saying that I knew of a cute little church out near where I lived that (as I recalled) had about 20 graves in its cute little churchyard. So everyone agreed that this seemed like a great idea because it was unlikely that anyone had done this one before. But, seeing as my memory of the church was supplied to be by my eleven-year-old brain, there were well over 20 graves… there are actually 153 graves within the yard.
This is a rough map (I hate to call it that) of the Quadrants of the Churchyard.

Q1: 2/26 graves have upright markers, Q2: 8/71, Q3: 7/39, Q4: 1/17. 
St. John the Baptist Church was the first Anglican Church in Colwood, built in 1912 and consecrated in 1913. It was an active church up until 1986 when the congregation moved to a new church close by. In 1996 it was restored and in 1997 the city of Colwood took over managing the church and its associated “pioneer” graveyards. All of this information is supplied on an upright stone by the southeast entrance to the yard, donated in memory of Ernie and Hilda Emery, more information on the church can be found on the city of Colwood's website: http://colwood.iwebez.com/siteengine/ActivePage.asp?PageID=39 .

We decided, after gathering information on most of the graves in Q1 and Q2 that some serious scaling down was in order. And so for this project we chose to look at up right markers over a foot tall to see if there were any similarities between them. The graveyard hosts 18 upright markers, in correlation with 9 single graves and 8 shared graves (one of which has 2 upright markers).

The graves that we have chosen mainly appear in Q2 and Q3, on the northeast half of the yard, and they mainly face northeast as well, with the exception of the graves closest to the northeast fence, which face the church. This is a commonality with all of the assumed inhumations in this churchyard, cremation plaques generally line the fence perimeter and orient towards the church. The most common dimensions for the graves with standing markers and a cement covering were 8ft by 4ft, with the exception of Hubert Wilberforce Wilson (who I wrote a blog about on Friday) who’s grave was 9ft by 4ft. The most common dimensions of the multiple graves were 8ft by 10ft. The markers themselves varied quite a bit, the shortest one we looked at was 1ft by 2ft, and the tallest being 5ft by 2.3ft.

The oldest burial in the graveyard is that of the Wells in Q3. It appears that the marker was first chosen and dedicated by his wife, Janet. The stone sits upon a typical cement 8ft by 4ft cement cover and stands 1.25ft by 1.5ft. The inscription reads “In loving memory of my husband Arthur Wells, sometimes rector of this perish, at rest Jan. 9, 1919, aged 60. Thy will be done. Janet Wells June 12, 1948, aged 91 yrs.” One interesting aspect of this grave is that it appears that there use to be another section to the top of the grave that may have been removed. The grave of Emma Ogden suggests that it too had a topper of some sorts; we believe that it could be possible for her and the Wells to have had crosses on top due to the similarity in the bases between the Wells and Daniel George Ruddle.
The top of the Wells grave.
The front of the Wells grave.

After the 1955 there are no “new” upright markers, meaning that all death dates appearing on upright markers past 1955 are being added onto pre-existing, shared, markers. The last marker appears to be that of the Hankins, Alfred (died 1955) and Eveline (died 1975), also in Q3. The name Verna M. Dyer (died 1942) is included at the bottom of the marker as well but, judging by the space the grave could take up, three inhumations would not fit, although the idea of cremations being added to the plot could explain this. This marker, unlike most of the ones we looked at, is not on top of a cement cover so we are not actually sure how large the grave plot is.

The tallest marker was that of Daniel George Ruddle, who died in 1936. The marker on his grave stands 5 ft tall; it consists of 1.25ft three-tiered base, bottom section being 2.5ft wide, with a 3.75ft cross on the top of it. It is based off of this grave that we believe that the Wells grave may have had a marker on top as well.  This grave sticks out the most in the churchyard, visually, and it would be an interesting task (given more time) to find out what type of impact he must have had in Colwood during his life.
Daniel George Ruddle
   The Rant grave,  8x10ft. Audrey Clark's plaque is in the centre.
The most people remembered on one grave are on the Rants/Clark marker. Annie shares her 8ft by 10ft with her husband Capt. William John Rant and Daughters (?) Geraldine Muriel Rant and Audrey Edith Clark. The first three names all appear on the same gravestone, standing 2.3 ft high and 2 ft wide, while Audrey’s name, birth, and death date appear on what seems to be a secondary marker added in the middle of the grave. We believe that, since the dimensions of the grave matches up with the average of the other double graves that either a) not all of the bodies are actually in this grave and Audrey’s marker is more of an epitaph is there to link her to her family while she might actually be buried somewhere else, or b) some of the Rant’s are buried here and some of them are cremated and were added to the grave later. The Rant stone includes the birthplaces and death place of both Annie and William but only supply the birth date and death date of Geraldine and Audrey.

From looking at the information gathered, we can show that upright markers in this churchyard are present between 1919 and 1955, are usually in association with grave covers measuring 8x4 or 8x10ft, and occur in relation to single graves as often as they do to shared graves. Also, the majority of upright graves appear on the north east side of the church; 83% of the markers were in Q2 and Q3. The highest ratio of upright markers to low graves is in Q3, where there was a 1:5.5 ratio, this lends to the idea that this section of the grave yard was more preferred for upright markers, possibly because it was more preferred by the wealthier members of the parish? Most of the grave markers in Q3 are granite, where as in Q 1,2, and 4 the markers were a mixture of granite and cement, this could indicate a higher economic class for those with granite head markers because during this time most of the islands granite came from Nelson island. In fact, the parliament buildings second stage of building took place around the same time as St. John's opened (1913-1915) which imported a great quantity of granite for its construction. The granite came from a Nelson Island quarry and it is possible that granite was more accessible due to the provincial demand. Another interesting little piece of information is that the Nelson mines declined in output in the 1950's and stopped in 1965, around the same time that we stop seeing the upright graves in the churchyard (Hora&Hancock).

 I feel that, given more time, we could have created our entire website project based on this churchyard. In order to learn more about the people in this cemetery we would need to do some research in the archives of city hall and potentially speak with some of the older members of the new parish.

Here is a link to the document filled with our data…
Grave Yard Data:
http://anth392withemily.blogspot.com/2012/02/st-john-baptist-heritage-church-colwood_18.html


 Our Google Map of the grave yard with pictures and all inscriptions of Upright Markers:
http://maps.google.ca/maps/ms?msid=204963798280823419783.0004b8079b916fc538ac8&msa=0

References:
Hora, Zdenek D. and Kirk D. Hancock, 2008. "Geology of the parliament buildings 6. Geology of the British Columbia parliament buildings, Victoria." Geoscience Canada. Geological Association of Canada. vol 35, no.2. 

St. John the Baptist: Heritage Church, Colwood B.C. Data

Quadrant and grave number
                                       Inscription
      HxW
Orientation
                           Notes



Q 1= 26= 2
Q 2=71= 8
Q 3= 39= 7
Q 4=17= 1
Total graves= 153
Total w/ markers over a foot= 18



1 -1
T. E. SCOTT
8x4ft
N/E
At front of Church
1 -2
Primary= Sergeant
Ronald W. Faulks
C.A.P.C.   C.E.F.
22nd April, 1945
Rest in Peace
Secondary=
In Memory of His Wife
Ada Winifred Faulks
(Millward)
(Later known as Sheilagh Folks)
April 19, 1889-March 30, 1987
8x4ft
N/E
Ada’s marker is added on top of Ronald’s.  Different stone is used for grave top, Ron’s marker, and Ada’s.
1-3
FAULKS
The Venerable      (Kilshaw)
Ronald STUART   ISABEL Mary
1910-2006          1914-2004
1x2.4ft
N/E
Has six “empty”, small plots below, (17”x17’) labelled 10-C through 10-H.
1-4
IN MEMORY OF
BARTLE
AGNES C.   JOSEPH E.
1879-1945                             1879-1963
AND DAUGHTER PEGGY
1914-1987
8x7.8ft
N/E
Daughter might not be an addition, possible space was left??
1-5
need pic
CHARNELL
W. STANLEY  VIOLET W.
1890-1964                           1891-1987
R.I.P.
2x1ft
N/E *?*


1-6
18
WILLIAM
ARTAUS
CHA/EL/
1.6X1.6ft
N/E
This one is not engraved, simply written on in black
1-7,8,9
No names/probably spot markers
0.8x1.6ft
S/E
Along N/W fence, for future cremations? No pictures
1- 10 & 11
“98”              &     “99”
1.6X1.6ft
S/E
1-12
IN LOVING MEMORY
EMERY
RICHARD    DOREEN
1930-                 1935-2011
1.4x2ft
S/E
Has fake flowers in the holder.

1-13,14, 15, 16

No names, like 7,8,& 9

0.8x1.6ft
S/E
N/W fence, empty ?
1-17
Primary=
WILLIAM J. KEDWARD
186/-19/8
MARY ANN KEDWARD
1867-1952
Secondary=
KEDWARD
WILLIAM J.           MARY ANN
1861-1958                              1867-1952
IN LOVING MEMORY
8x10ft

1x2
N/E
482615N, 1232918W
Primary is at foot of the grave, (Will then Mary) secondary is an added tomb stone at the head of the grave
1-18

No name/spot marker

0.8x1.6ft
S/E
N/E fence
1-19
Michael Clark
McCUTCHEON
Born in Echuca, Australia
December 8, 1941
Died in Victoria B.C.
December 5,1999
At Peace In God’s Love
0.8x1.3ft
S/E

1-20
STICKLE
HAROLD LLOYD
1928-1998
In Loving Memory
1x1.7ft
S/E

1-21

No name/extra

0.8x1.6ft
S/E
N/E fence
1-22
JENKINS
LOVING           MEMORY
SYD       LYN
YDNEY D.         HELENA
1881-1952                           1882-1979
BOTH             BORN
ARDIFF          WALES

8x9

N/E
482616N, 1232923W

1-23 LAST PIC
STOKER
IN LOVING MEMORY OF
ERNEST JOHN
1892-1967
DOROTGY EVELYN
1899-1991
8x4ft
N/E

1-24
MARY PETERSON
188/ -1991
8.8X4.5ft
N/E

1-25
K/93537 CPL L.F.A. JOHNSTONE
1895-1962
R.C.E
“Lest We Forget”
8x4ft
N/E
Has a cross engraved on marker characteristic to the military
1-26
Primary=
BAILEY
MARK              MARY E.
1867-1952                             1866-1952
Secondary=
CONSTANCE (DELLA)
BAILEY
1894-1987
8X9ft
N/E

     DIVIDER
BETWEEN             Q1 & Q2
      IS 
      BIG
                    TREE
2- 1
Primary=
R.I.P.
RICHARD
EV
YERBURGH
18/9-1941
Secondary=
MARY E.
YERBURGH
1887-1976
8x4ft
N/E
482620N, 1232919W
Primary is on a stand-up cross,
Secondary added to foot of grave
2-2
FLORENCE M. MacGREGOR
1891-1951
8x4ft
N/E

2-3
DONALD B. MacGREGOR
1928-1957
8x4ft
N/E

2-4
PETER JOSEPH
CHARBONNEAU
1910-1977
0.8x1ft
S/E

2-5
IN LOVEING MEMORY
CHRISTA DAWN
TERLSON
MAR.25.1976-MAR.27.1977
1x1.6ft
S/E

2-6
IN LOVING MEMORY
THOMAS        THOMAS-BRUCE
MILBURN                  MILBURN
1885-1973                1922-1983
REST IN PEACE
1x1.6ft
S/E

2-7
ANNIE MILBURN
1890-1977
REST IN PEACE
0.8x1.1ft
S/E


2-8
HAMLIN
RONALD                      JOAN
JULY 20, 1920    MAR. 19,1920
NOV. 9, 1980        JUNE 21,2008
FOREVER WITH THE LORD
1x1.6ft

S/E

2-9
DENISE MICHELLE
ANDERSON
BORN SEPT. 27, 1977
DIED FEB. 10, 1984
0.8x1ft
S/E

2-10
IN LOVING MEMORY
FLOYD DENNIS
PEARSE
SEPT. 23. 1920* MAY 29. 1985
REST IN PEACE
0.8x1ft
S/E

2-11
WM. K. DUNSTER
1921-1968
R.I.P
0.8x1.2ft
S/E

2-12
REV. H. R. DUNSTER
1887-1971
REST IN PEACE
0.8x1.2ft
S/E

2-13
LAURA A.
DUNSTER
1887-1983
REST IN PEACE
0.8x1.2ft
S/E

2-14
DORIS KATHLEEN
STRINGER
1894-1984
0.8x1ft
S/E

2-15
NATHAN ELIOT
CROFT
APRIL 30. 1985
LITTLE ANGEL
0.8x1ft
S/E
Child grave, engraving of a child angel praying, made by mortimers Victoria B.C.
2-16
ROBERT GEORGE
FIEGEHEN
1905-1980
0.5x1.2ft
S/E

2-17
ELMA MAUD
FIEGEHEN
1899-1978
0.5x1.2ft
S/E

2-18
McLEOD
MALCOLM        MARGARET
GORDON               BELLE
1864-1946            1888-1930
In Ever Loving Memory
8x9ft
N/E
Pink stone used for header
2-19
50
MARY JANE
BEADLE
1.5x1.5ft
N/E
Same as G1-6 stone, looks like tar writing,

2-20

L41029 PTE. W. J. DAVIES
1896-1961
SASK. LIGHT INFANTRY
„LEST WE FORGET“

8x4ft

N/E

Same style as G1-25
2-21
IN
LOVING MEMORY OF
W. H. FOREMAN
BORN AT WHITSTABLE, ENG.
DIED APL.7 1930
AGED 79
8x4ft
Stone=
2.5x1.5ft

N/E
482619N, 1232919W
Standing stone on grave
2-22
In Loving Memory of
WILLIAM PARNELL
DESPARD PEMBERTON
DIED JAN. 27 1951
8x4ft
1x2
N/E
482617N, 1232918W

2-23
In Loving Memory of
CARO EILEEN MAROORIE
BELOVED WIFE OF W. P. D. PEMBERTON
DIED DEC. 21 1949
8x4ft
1x2
N/E
482617N, 1232918W

2-24
REV. CANON GUY P. TERRY
1861-1943
8x4ft
N/E
Name at the foot on grave border
2-25
HEMING
CECIL FARNBOROUGH
1879-1961
MARION KATHARINE
1886-1981
IN LOVING MEMORY
8x4ft
N/E

2-26
Head=
LILIAN ETHEL TYE
1886-1958
Foot=
DOREEN I. M. B



2-27
WARE
1.5x1.5ft
N/E
Mark
2-28
Top=  FANNY BICKFORD
Bottom= BORN APRIL 2. 1851
DIED JULY 27.1920
L.Side=WILLIAM THOMAS BICKFORD
1851-1928
8x4ft
N/E


2-29
CORRIE
1.5x1.5ft
N/E

2-30
ELIZABETH WANLESS HOCKLEY
1837-1923
8x4ft
N/E

2-31
ILLEGIBLE
8x4ft
N/E

2-32
BROMLEY DAVIS
QUINNEY
1877-1920
8x4
N/E

2-33
GEORGE M.
DAVIES
1890-1961

8x4
N/E

2-34
MADELINE
DAVIES
1898-1980
1x0.5
S/E

2-35
REX
BEVERLEY
NOV. 16. 1928-JUNE 26.1986
WE LOVE YOU
10”x12”
S/E



2-36
STANLEY A.
HUMPHRIES
1907-1987
REST IN PEACE
12”x16”
S/E

2-37
MICHAEL S. A.
STEPHEN
1963-1995
DENIED THE CHANCE
12”x16”
S/E

2-38
ETHEL N.
HUMPHRIES
1925-1991
MUCH LOVE
12”x16”
S/E

2-39
IN
LOVING MEMORY OF
LESLEY L. SCOTT
1919-1987
10”x12”
S/E

2-40
IN
LOVING MEMORY
OF
JOHN L. SCOTT
1919-1989
10”x12”
S/E

2-41
IN LOVING MEMORY OF
JOSEPH       AUDREY
ARTHUR      CATHERINE
1916-1995       1920-2001
GIBBONS
19”x26”
S/E

2-42
132
10”x20”
S/E

2-43
Right=
IN LOVING MEMORY OF
MARCELLA HARRISON
1907-1939
ELLEN C. MATSON
1886-1963
/N THE GARDEN
Left=
IN LOVING MEMORY OF
ELLEN VIOLET
HARRISON
1917-1932
SAFE IN THE ARMS OF JESUS
8X10FT
N/E

2-44
Top=
PETER       INGEBORG
1857-1955             1855-1929
Bottom=
BUGSLAG
8X10FT
N/E

2-45
IN
LOVING MEMORY
OF
RUTH E. MARRIOTT
BORN MAY 16, 1912
DIED JAN. 13, 1930.
8x4ft
2x1.5ft
N/E
48267N, 1232958W

2-46




2-47
LEUTENANT COLONEL
DAVID DONALD
C. A. M. C.  C. E. F.
2ND FEB. 1936
BORN AT
ABERDEEN SCOTTLAND
AUGUST 14TH 1866
8x4ft
3x1.2ft
N/E
482619N, 1232944W

2-48




2-49






2-50
In Loving Memory of
CAPT WILLIAM JOHN RANT
BORN IN DUBLIN, IRELAND
JULY 31,1851
DIED IN VICTORIA, B.C.
JANUARY 20 1930
AND
ANNIE
WIFE OF CAPT. W. J. RANT
BORN IN RANCOD, BURMA
APRIL 20, 1861
DIED IN VICTORIA, B.C.
NOVEMBER 8, 1929.
GERALDINE MURIEL RANT
DEC.18 1891-July 26. 1863
2ND=
IN LOVING MEMORY OF
AUDREY EDITH
CLARK
1896-1969
8x10ft
2.3x2ft
S/W
482617N, 1232926W

2-51




2-52




2-53
2-69




2-70
OGDEN
In Loving Memory of
EMMA GODEN
BORN SEPT. 30 1867
DIED NOV. 28 1947
8x4ft
1x2
S/W
482626N, 1232846W

2-71




END
OF QUAD 2 IN LINE WITH MIDDLE
N/E
TREE
AT FENCE
3- (1-8)




3-9
IN LOVING MEMORY
OF MY HUSBAND
……………..
ARTHUR WELLS
SOMETIMES
RECTOR OF THIS PARISH
AT REST JAN. 6, 1919 AGED 60
THY WILL BE DONE
………..
JANET WELLS
JUNE 12 1948
AGED 91 YRS.
Bottom=
WELLS
8x4
1.25x1.9
N/W
482618N, 1232919W
Missing topper?
3-(10-22)




3-23
To The Memory of
ELISE
WIDOW OF
REV. JOHN EVANS D. D.
BORN OCT. 24 1861
DIED AUG. 5 1951
Rest In Peace
8x4
1.25x1.9ft
482619N, 1232919W
S/W
Missing cross?
3-(24-28)









3-29
In
Loving Memory
Of
DANIEL GEORGE RUDDLE
BORN LONDON ENGLAND
JAN. 1 1866
DIED AUG. 27 1936
“INTO YOU WHICH BELIEVE
HE IS PRECIOUS”
8x4
5x2.3ft
N/W
482615N, 1232933W

3-30




3-31
TURNER
MARY ANNE     JOSHUA HARVEY
TURNER            TURNER
1871-1951         1879-1958
PEACE PERFECT PEACE
Bottem=
POLLIE                                               JOSS
8x9ft
1.5x2.3
482616N, 1232918W

N/W

3-32
HANKINS
IN LOVING MEMORY OF
EVELINE           ALFRED
1883-1975           1880-1955
VERENA M. DYER
1864-1942
8x4
1.4x2.5ft
N/W
482618n
1232917w

3-33




3-34
HUBERT WILBERFORCE
WILSON
1857-1949
9x4
1.9x2.5ft
482618N, 1232918W
N/W
Tallest grave in yard


3-35




3-36
In Loving Memory of
MARY ANN
GODFREY
BORN
NEWCASTLE ON TYNE
APRIL 29 1872
DIED OCT 13 1940
BUT THEN AT BREAK OF DAY
HIS OWN ALMIGHTY VOICE
STRONGER THAN DEATH SHALL SAY
“AWAKE, ARISE, REJOICE”
(left)
In Loving Memory of
ALFRED
GODFREY
BORN
OCKLEY, SURREY ENG.
JULY 5 1878
Died july 15 1964
“HE LIVED AS A
CHRISTIAN GENTLEMAN”
8x8.75
2.6x1.6
N/E
482619N, 1232918W
2 full head stones
3-(37-39)




BEGINNING
OF QUAD 4
Even with
Concrete
Parking spot??
4-(1-3)




4-4
I70-1937N LOVING MEMORY OF
GEORGE WILLIAM
1870-1937
ROSE ILOTT
1871-1951
ILOTT
8x10
2.4x3.4
N/W
482619N, 1232920W

4-(5-17)